Wednesday, April 13, 2011

President Barack Obama's Speech on Budget Reduction and Spending Priorities - Rebuilding, Refurbishing and Restoring America

In case you did not see President Barack Obama's speech today on federal budget reduction and spending priorities, here it is.


You Tube Video Of President Obama's April 13 Speech on Spending and Deficit Reduction

Some excerpts from President Obama's speech:

... From our first days as a nation, we have put our faith in free markets and free enterprise as the engine of America’s wealth and prosperity.  More than citizens of any other country, we are rugged individualists, a self-reliant people with a healthy skepticism of too much government. 
But there’s always been another thread running through our history -– a belief that we’re all connected, and that there are some things we can only do together, as a nation.  We believe, in the words of our first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln, that through government, we should do together what we cannot do as well for ourselves. 
And so we’ve built a strong military to keep us secure, and public schools and universities to educate our citizens.  We’ve laid down railroads and highways to facilitate travel and commerce.  We’ve supported the work of scientists and researchers whose discoveries have saved lives, unleashed repeated technological revolutions, and led to countless new jobs and entire new industries.  Each of us has benefitted from these investments, and we’re a more prosperous country as a result.
Part of this American belief that we’re all connected also expresses itself in a conviction that each one of us deserves some basic measure of security and dignity.  We recognize that no matter how responsibly we live our lives, hard times or bad luck, a crippling illness or a layoff may strike any one of us.  “There but for the grace of God go I,” we say to ourselves.  And so we contribute to programs like Medicare and Social Security, which guarantee us health care and a measure of basic income after a lifetime of hard work; unemployment insurance, which protects us against unexpected job loss; and Medicaid, which provides care for millions of seniors in nursing homes, poor children, those with disabilities.  We’re a better country because of these commitments.  I’ll go further.  We would not be a great country without those commitments.        
Now, for much of the last century, our nation found a way to afford these investments and priorities with the taxes paid by its citizens.  As a country that values fairness, wealthier individuals have traditionally borne a greater share of this burden than the middle class or those less fortunate.  Everybody pays, but the wealthier have borne a little more.  This is not because we begrudge those who’ve done well -– we rightly celebrate their success.  Instead, it’s a basic reflection of our belief that those who’ve benefited most from our way of life can afford to give back a little bit more.  Moreover, this belief hasn’t hindered the success of those at the top of the income scale.  They continue to do better and better with each passing year....
and:
... But that starts by being honest about what’s causing our deficit.  You see, most Americans tend to dislike government spending in the abstract, but like the stuff that it buys.  Most of us, regardless of party affiliation, believe that we should have a strong military and a strong defense.  Most Americans believe we should invest in education and medical research.  Most Americans think we should protect commitments like Social Security and Medicare.  And without even looking at a poll, my finely honed political instincts tell me that almost nobody believes they should be paying higher taxes.  (Laughter.)
So because all this spending is popular with both Republicans and Democrats alike, and because nobody wants to pay higher taxes, politicians are often eager to feed the impression that solving the problem is just a matter of eliminating waste and abuse.  You’ll hear that phrase a lot.  “We just need to eliminate waste and abuse.”  The implication is that tackling the deficit issue won’t require tough choices.  Or politicians suggest that we can somehow close our entire deficit by eliminating things like foreign aid, even though foreign aid makes up about 1 percent of our entire federal budget. 
So here’s the truth.  Around two-thirds of our budget -- two-thirds -- is spent on Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and national security.  Two-thirds.  Programs like unemployment insurance, student loans, veterans’ benefits, and tax credits for working families take up another 20 percent.  What’s left, after interest on the debt, is just 12 percent for everything else.  That’s 12 percent for all of our national priorities -- education, clean energy, medical research, transportation, our national parks, food safety, keeping our air and water clean -- you name it -- all of that accounts for 12 percent of our budget.
Now, up till now, the debate here in Washington, the cuts proposed by a lot of folks in Washington, have focused exclusively on that 12 percent.  But cuts to that 12 percent alone won’t solve the problem.  So any serious plan to tackle our deficit will require us to put everything on the table, and take on excess spending wherever it exists in the budget. 
A serious plan doesn’t require us to balance our budget overnight –- in fact, economists think that with the economy just starting to grow again, we need a phased-in approach –- but it does require tough decisions and support from our leaders in both parties now.  Above all, it will require us to choose a vision of the America we want to see five years, 10 years, 20 years down the road....
The closing remarks of President Obama's speech:
... This larger debate that we’re having -- this larger debate about the size and the role of government -- it has been with us since our founding days.  And during moments of great challenge and change, like the one that we’re living through now, the debate gets sharper and it gets more vigorous.  That’s not a bad thing.  In fact, it’s a good thing.  As a country that prizes both our individual freedom and our obligations to one another, this is one of the most important debates that we can have. 
But no matter what we argue, no matter where we stand, we’ve always held certain beliefs as Americans.  We believe that in order to preserve our own freedoms and pursue our own happiness, we can’t just think about ourselves.  We have to think about the country that made these liberties possible.  We have to think about our fellow citizens with whom we share a community.  And we have to think about what’s required to preserve the American Dream for future generations. 
This sense of responsibility -- to each other and to our country -- this isn’t a partisan feeling.  It isn’t a Democratic or a Republican idea.  It’s patriotism.
The other day I received a letter from a man in Florida.  He started off by telling me he didn’t vote for me and he hasn’t always agreed with me.  But even though he’s worried about our economy and the state of our politics -- here’s what he said -- he said, “I still believe.  I believe in that great country that my grandfather told me about.  I believe that somewhere lost in this quagmire of petty bickering on every news station, the ‘American Dream’ is still alive…We need to use our dollars here rebuilding, refurbishing and restoring all that our ancestors struggled to create and maintain… We as a people must do this together, no matter the color of the state one comes from or the side of the aisle one might sit on.”
“I still believe.”  I still believe as well.  And I know that if we can come together and uphold our responsibilities to one another and to this larger enterprise that is America, we will keep the dream of our founding alive -- in our time; and we will pass it on to our children.  We will pass on to our children a country that we believe in. 
Thank you.  God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.
The full text of President Obama's speech and fact sheet.

Republican Congressman Paul Ryan, Chairman of the House Budget Committee responds to President Obama's speech.



Commentary on the speech from Andrew Sullivan's Daily Dish

14 comments :

SML said...

Obama talks the talk, now let's see him walk the walk.

View from NY said...

I am glad you posted this. You should also highlight the part how makes no sense to give each millionaire/billionaire average of $200k in tax cuts to be paid for by 33 seniors paying more for Medicare. Well somebody has to be paying for that ski holidays.

Anonymous said...

How about the 49% not paying any taxes, and all these single mothers getting money when they pay no taxes at all. This is typical RI speak just join RIRA and smoke what they smoke.

Anonymous said...

What about all those people living off of government vouchers for housing. They should get a job or something. Oh wait, that's half of the island.

Anonymous said...

as long as i get my sec8 to live in a 4,000 apartment in roosevelt landings,i am happy. let sec8 pay my rent ,i would not pay it , the place is a dump. let the owner keep ripping , off the tax payers,

Anonymous said...

if i get a job ,i will lose my voucher,i am not a fool.do you think i can pay a 4,000, rent no way , god bless america.you people in south town are happy paying those big rents , good for all of you; why should i go get a job , i like living here . .

Anonymous said...

there are people living in southtown on sec8 ,good for them.maybe i should move there ,also

Anonymous said...

Enjoy all the Govt programs while you can including Social security, Medicare, medicaid, Section 8 and everything else. In the next several years it will all be coming to an end. In case anyone hasn't noticed the govt is nearly 15 trillion in debt. I for one can't wait for everything to collapse, since that is the ONLY way there will be some real change and the out of control spending will stop.

Gregor said...

It's not so much the social safety programs the government offers that are the problem, it's the health-care providers, pharmaceutical companies, the hospitals that rip off the government in all kinds of creative ways that's the problem.

The AMA, big pharma, American Hospital Association - they are powerful players on Capitol Hill, you can be sure they pay hefty donations to keep the Medicare/Medicaid gravy train rolling. But that's capitalism, that's free speech isn't it - giving the powerful groups of health care corporations the right to pay donations to politicians so reimbursement rates & rules continue to favor these giant companies.

I wouldn't blame the poor who have so little clout in government. The amount they get even in total is chicken-feed compared to how much ripping goes on in the field of health care, pharma, health insurance. Oh, but that's one of the biggest sectors of the US economy so how could we possibly tighten up the rules and reimbursement rates in that sector - that would be too much gov control, oh dear!

How about the landlords and their powerful lobbyists? Oh - yes that's capitalism and free speech again so we can't comment negatively about them! They insist on pricing mark to market apartments - packing in kids, roomates to apartments, and selling the package because you know - it's NY, so it's great - even though you are getting ripped off.

As despicable as the above commenter sounds - he's of course baiting everyone, or trying to - he's right on one point at least: Eastwood is a dump, so why should apartments there be going for 4K/mo? Is that right?

Anonymous said...

4,ooo in eastwood .its because sec8 is paying it the owner is ripping off the tax payers , where is the gym, pool , doorman and people say i am ripping off the tax payers because i get sec 8 . why dont you go and find out .what person in hud appoved this deal for sec8 to pay market rents in eastwood ,they do not pay these kind of rent anywhere but here ,without sec8 paying these rents the owner would not have a building .

Anonymous said...

i would love to get a job. but if i do ,i will lose my sec8 , and then i must pay the rent of my apartment without the help of sec8 , in which i can not do .if the rent was within a fair price ,then i would get off sec8 and pay the rent myself . but as long as sec8 is letting this owner charge these cazy rents , because he knows sec8 is paying the rent he will just keep on doing it so what can i do ,i dont want to move, hud must tell this owner that he must lower these rents , the place is a dump.how can you charge these rents no more ,but as long as sec8 is paying the rent , the owner will keep on doing it ,so now tell me you is ripping off the tax payers , me or the owner.

jr said...

i see the people going to work from southtown , going to starbucks for lattes .and their new york times .you are all so uppery.but us poor people are not leaving the island .too bad.

Anonymous said...

Why don't you get a job and then get an apartment you can afford, like the rest of us. If that means you have a 2 hour commute or live in a crappy place for a few years while you work your way up to a real wage, just deal with it - it's what the rest of us did.

Gregor said...

To Anonymous poster above: Even if jr did that, employers may prefer to recruit from the suburban, or college-educated population, and jr doesn't sound like he is a member of that stratum.

It's not that jr couldn't do a complex job, it's that he isn't in the socio-cultural stratum that's in demand - well-spoken, good command of the English language, good academic credentials, various interesting activities/hobbies on resume. Someone a co-worker could invite out for a beer, someone who would fit in with the other employees.

Previously, if a New Yorker didn't want to go the middle-class/educated route, there were always plenty of jobs for those with no high school education even, and even on Wall St there were always plenty of jobs for people of all educational and socio-economic backgrounds. But no more.

That is why the unemployment rate for people in jr's stratum is probably more like 30%, not 8.8%.

But, the US should just keep on exporting jobs to East Asia.

And the US should just keep on importing the brains from East Asia and around the world along with providing employment and careers to those Americans with good educations & nice suburban backgrounds. These people put in their time in NY, either return to their usually much more pleasant homelands, or eventually move to a nice spread in the suburbs, to begin the cycle again of raising well-educated suburban kids, the ones employers hire.

Since there's little chance jr could get a job - even a crappy job - jr is probably doing the smartest thing under the circumstances - staying in Eastwood. If you were in his shoes, with his level of education and lack of social graces in general minimizing the likelihood of finding employment, you would probably do exactly the same thing.