Take this virtual bumpy trip with a Roosevelt Island Mountain Bike Rider along the West Promenade from the Octagon to subway station with a stop for some fresh fruit and then down the escalator to F Train for parts unknown.
Red, Blue, White: Bodies of Light
Paintings by Valeriu Boborelu
Saturday, April 28, 2012 - Sunday, June 3, 2012
Opening Reception: Saturday April 28th, from 6-9pm.
A Romanian art educator, whose creative spiritual vision brought him to the US in 1983, Boborelu paints fractal layers of space/time. Luminous beings gesture and vibrate in the cosmic dance of karma.
Curator: Johanes Ruta http://AzothGallery.com
Reported last week on 5 new leases signed by retail Master Leaseholder Hudson Related for Roosevelt Island's Main Street:
Last Wednesday, Hudson Related representative Andrew Jackson met with a group from the Roosevelt Island Residents Association (RIRA) Main Street Retail Committee to discuss what is happening with the Main Street retail situation....Retail leasing activity includes new tenants and renewals, including:· Island Spirts, a new wine and liquor store will open at 605 Main St. The island has been without a wine store for several years.
· Wholesome Direct, a gourmet and organic natural food market at 530 Main St.
· Europan Bakery Cafe at 503 Main St. will offer fresh gourmet foods, beverages and baked goods.
· Subway Sandwich at 513 Main St. will offer sandwiches for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.
· The Child School is opening a 7,000 square foot fine arts center at the upper floor of 504 Main St, which will be complementary space to the School’s other existing facilities on Roosevelt Island and will include art, music, drama and dance studios....
By ROOSEVELT ISLANDER at 4:19:00 PM 12 comments
Labels: 504 main street , Hudson Related , Main Street , Main Street Retail Master Lease Agreement , Retail
... Imagine being able to sit, relax and eat some good food right next to the East River with these stunning NYC Skyline, Waterfront and Queensboro Bridge views in the evening...Here are questions submitted by potential bidders and answers provided by RIOC.
Questions and Answers
1. What is the duration of the project?
This is a pilot beginning May 15, 2012 through October 15, 2012. The term of the project will be for one year.
2. Will alcoholic beverages be allowed on site?
No alcoholic beverages are permitted or allowed to be sold on the site.
3. What are the hours of operation?
The hours of operation are from 11 am through 9 pm as stated in the RFP; proposers should clearly designate their intended hours of operation within these hours in their proposal.
4. Will advertising be allowed?
The display of third-party advertisements on signage or menus will not be allowed. Signage to promote the saleable items will be allowed.
5. What format should the bid be presented in?
All proposals should be typed and presented on your company letterhead.
6. What is the allowed seating capacity?
The seating capacity on the intended site of operations (Area 1) as laid out in the site plan included in the RFP is for up to 30 patrons.
7. What is the maximum boundary that the vendor will be held responsible for cleaning and maintaining?
The vendor will be responsible for cleaning and maintaining Area’s 1 and 2 as laid out in the site plan included in the RFP, as well as removal of any refuse generated by customers in the area immediately adjacent to these areas.
8. Is the space delivered as is or will RIOC clean the area?
The space will be power-washed prior to the selected vendor beginning services. Graffiti removal will not be included.
9. Is Area 2 as laid out in the site plan included in the space to be leased to the vendor?
Only Area 1 will be leased to the vendor for the term of the project.
10. Is water or electrical supply available?
There is no water supply in the area; the successful proposer will have to provide their own. As indicated in the RFP, limited electrical supply is available at a rate of $500 per month to be added to the fees owed to RIOC for operating the venture.
11. Can we submit alternate proposals?
Alternative operational plans or elements will be considered. Please clearly identify any such alternatives within the proposal.
12. Can bathrooms be located away from the area?
If a location adjacent to Area 1 or 2 for the ADA compliant portable bathrooms is included in the proposal it will be considered, if an alternate location is it must be approved by RIOC.
13. Will smoking be allowed in the area?
There is no smoking allowed in the area licensed to the vendor.
14. Why is menu pricing subject to RIOC approval?
RIOC will require menu pricing to be maintained at the quoted price during the term of the project. Therefore, the proposed pricing must be recorded. Any proposed changes during the term of the license will be subject to RIOC approval.
15. Will RIOC reimburse expenses for costs incurred in preparation of proposals?
As with all other RFP’s, RIOC will not reimburse any expenses incurred in connection with this project for preparation of proposals.
Additional Questions and Answers 4/25/2012
1. Question and Answer 2 states that no alcohol will be permitted or sold on the site. Question and Answer 6 states that seating is limited to 30 patrons. However, question and answer 11 states that alternative operational plans or elements will be considered.
The specifications per the RFP are clearly stated that there will be no alcohol and the seating is up to 30 seats. However, the prospective bidder may, in addition to submitting a bid per the specifications in the RFP, submit an alternative operational with changed elements as part of their proposal. This does not mean that the alternative will be approved. The seating is limited to area 1. Area 2 is open to the public.
2. Area 1 is the vending area. Area 2 is an area that you can not vend in but are responsible for cleaning? Is this correct?
This is correct. You are responsible for cleaning Area 1 and 2, as well as any refuse generated by customers in the area immediately adjacent to these areas.
3. Area 1 is the designated area licensed to the vendor and there is no smoking. Is smoking allowed in area 2?
Smoking will be allowed in Area 2, and any area outside the area licensed to the vendor.
4. Does RIOC consider the total square footage for this project solely the 2272.92 sq. ft in Area 1 or is it the square footage for Area 1 + Area 2 (4143.25 sq. ft)?
The total square footage to be licensed to the vendor (“the project area”) is the 2272.92 square feet identified as Area 1.
5. Can you please define the differences between "term of the project" vs "duration of the project" as mentioned in question #1
There is no difference between the “term of the project” and “duration of the project”. The term/duration of the project will be May 15th through October 15th as specified in the RFP.
By ROOSEVELT ISLANDER at 12:48:00 PM 7 comments
Labels: request for proposal , Restaurants , Subway Pier , waterfront restaurant
Image of Potential Roosevelt Island Bike Sharing Station from Hunter College Access RI(Page 39)
Would you like to see Bike Sharing come to Roosevelt Island? If the answer is yes, make sure you attend the Community Planning Board 8 Transportation Committee May 2 6:30 PM meeting. On the Agenda is a:
Discussion of having a station or stations on Roosevelt Island as part of the DOT pilot Bike Share ProgramHere's the flyer announcing the meeting.
By ROOSEVELT ISLANDER at 5:28:00 PM 17 comments
Labels: bicycle sharing , Bike , citibike , Community Board 8
The future looked rosy 100 years ago, when New York undertook a revolutionary plan to build a vast network of subways and elevated trains. But it looks considerably different today, as we struggle to meet urgent transit needs.Here's more on the Chicago Infrastructure Bank.
Anyone who’s crammed their way on to a crowded tram at rush hour, waited for the F train to the Roosevelt Island station or struggled to find alternate ways to get on and off the island on the weekend understands that while Manhattan is blessed with tremendous public transit, there is still room for needed improvement and expansion.
One million more people will be living in our City by 2025 and to put it bluntly: We are not ready. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority -- the central nervous system of our regional transportation network -- is a fiscal house of cards.
This crucially important agency is being held together with a combination of unprecedented borrowing, and fare hikes as far as the eye can see. That’s no way to run a railroad, much less the nation’s largest transit system.
What’s needed is a new, more stable stream of revenue for the MTA, one that stabilizes its operating budget but also allows us to expand the system to reflect where people live and work today, not 100 years ago.
Here’s my plan: an infrastructure bank for mass transit that I call the “New York City Transit Trust.”
Mayors across the country are recognizing that cities cannot rely solely on state and federal funding for infrastructure. In Chicago, Rahm Emanuel has launched the Chicago Infrastructure Trust to leverage private capital for needed projects.
The New York City Transit Trust will also leverage private dollars, by tying New York City’s infrastructure bank to a dedicated revenue stream – our existing Mortgage Recording Tax -- which now helps fund the MTA”s operating costs.
Today, the Lexington Avenue line on the East Side of Manhattan alone carries more passengers per day than any other subway system in the United States. The Second Avenue Subway (SAS) will alleviate this overcrowding when it opens in 2016. However, today, we’ve funded only one of four phases of the SAS train. The Transit Trust could help us fund phase 2, linking SAS to the Metro-North at 125th Street and providing additional service in East Harlem.
The Transit Trust could provide capital for a range of projects, many of which can improve the lives of thousands of Manhattan residents. We must do more to unlock the potential of the City’s 6 borough: the waterfront. The Transit Trust could allow us to explore how ferry service can help alleviate commuting time for Roosevelt Island and other waterfront neighborhoods as well as improve the region's economy.
In addition, our crosstown buses, which are consistently the slowest in the entire City, could be upgraded with new technology, which has already improved service on 34th Street. Bus Rapid Transit could also be expanded to the West Side, after its successful debut on First and Second Avenues. And the Trust could underwrite a renewal of light rail—once a pillar of public transit in Manhattan—that could speed commutes and improve connectivity throughout the borough. the Trust could benefit riders all over the City by paying for new subway cars and buses and improving safety and reliability by replacing track and upgrading outdated signals.
Of course, if we are going to redirect the Mortgage Recording Tax to the MTA’s capital needs, we have to replace it on the operations side with a new, reliable funding stream.
I believe we should start by getting back what we lost when the City’s commuter tax was repealed in 1999.
The commuter tax, which affects people who work in NYC but live outside the five boroughs, produced billions of dollars in revenue for New York City between 1966 and 1999. If we reinstated it at the same rate as when it was killed 14 years ago, we would raise $725 million a year to support the region’s transportation network.
It’s the right thing to do. Every day, close to a million commuters pour into New York City, using our roads, bridges and rails to get here and relying on our police, fire and sanitation services when they arrive.
All we need is leadership – leadership that recognizes that real investment in transit projects always pays huge dividends down the road, and that there are new, more creative ways to fund those projects.
That’s how you create a true, five-borough transportation network and prepare New York for the next century of growth.
Cresting the 59th Street Bridge, and pacing a Roosevelt Island Cable car until it passes another cable car from the other direction....
3/22/2012 - S/O 200 Main St - Rat poison found by cat shelter at location. Substance was removed. Search of area yielded negative results for subject who placed it there.The Roosevelt Island Public Safety Report for March 22 - 23 reported the incident as follows:
Investigation - Unknown substance placed by cat shelter. It was removed.Here's the Monthly Roosevelt Island Public Safety Blotter for March 2012
By ROOSEVELT ISLANDER at 2:20:00 PM 1 comments
Labels: cat poison , dog poison , Monthly Public Safety Report , Public Safety
Image of Roosevelt Island's Island House EntranceStatus of Privatization/Affordability Plan and Ground Lease Extension for Island House;...Earlier this week, the Island House Tenants Association (IHTA) distributed this update regarding the privatization status of their building.
Update on Island HouseMore on the Island House Privatization plan from previous post last January including this December 2011 excerpt from IHTA letter to Governor Cuomo:
We are pleased to be able to tell you that there has been significant progress in moving forward the Island House Affordable Conversion Plan. Through the efforts of the Governor's Office For Economic Development, RIOC, DHCR, ESDC, our elected officials, and the owner, there is agreement on the plan and moving it ahead. We understand a letter from RIOC to the New York State Legislature confirming this will be delivered very shortly.
Once the RIOC letter is transmitted, the final process for implementing the Affordability Plan can begin. The State, DHCR and RIOC will put together a process for "next steps" for moving ahead including a ground lease vote by RIOC, the exit of the building from Mitchell Lama into the affordable rent and purchase structure and protections in the plan, and the submission of the conversion plan to the NY Attorney General for his required review.
We will be announcing a date, time and location for a tenant meeting on all this in the next few days. IHTA, our lawyer, and the agencies will be in a position to provide more specific, detailed information on what will happen over the next few months.
As we move into what we are all hoping is the final phase -- we want to thank you, the tenants, for all your support and encouragement over the last couple of years. Despite the frustrations we have all shared at the slowness of the process, you should know that your steadfastness and overwhelming support for staying focused on the need for an affordable solution that protects the interests of all tenants, whether as renters or purchasers, has been critical in moving our plan to this stage.
We are also delighted to able to let you know that the first fully modernized elevator cab is going into service this week at 555 and that the second new cab will go into service at 575 next week. Work on the next two elevators will start promptly thereafter. Also, with a lot of thanks to our Assemblyman Micah Kellner, FIOS is now on track (shortly) to be available as an alternative cable service.
The IHTA Board
... Working under the auspices of DHCR for several years, the tenants and owner have crafted a groundbreaking Plan that, first and foremost, secures aggressive rent protections and affordability for tenants who wish to stay and not purchase their apartments while allowing tenants who wish to buy their apartments the opportunity to do so at a 65% discount below market pricing, with additional provisions to ensure affordability for future generations of purchasers. This Plan was overwhelmingly endorsed by the tenancy in a building-wide vote in September 2009.Island House appears to be moving forward with an affordable privatization exit plan from the NY State Mitchell Lama program. As to Westview, nothing much seems to be happening since Crains NY reported last November:
Through the efforts of your Office for Economic Development, which has been engaged for nearly a year, the tenants and owner have recently agreed to substantially modify the previously agreed upon Affordability Plan in a way that is projected to result in payments to RIOC of over $20,000,000. This is in addition to the $15,000,000 or more that will be paid to ESDC from increased real estate tax payments under the Plan. In addition to these payments aggregating in excess of $35,000,000, ESDC will also be promptly repaid the full outstanding mortgage of $20,000,000....
... David Hirschhorn, who is a principal at two of the complexes, said he is committed to making sure one of the developments, Island House, remains at least 70% affordable. He is less certain about the second development, called Westview.Information on Roosevelt Island Rivercross privatization efforts available at this previous post.
“Westview [negotiations are] not nearly as advanced as Island House,” Mr. Hirschhorn said....
By ROOSEVELT ISLANDER at 11:43:00 AM 23 comments
Labels: Affordable housing , Island House , Island House Privatization , Mitchell Lama , privatization , RIOC Real Estate Committee , Westview
The 4/21 -22 Roosevelt Island Public Safety Incident Report indicated:
Parachute - Male wanted to jump from a hill with a parachute. He was not allowed to do so for safety reasons.Yesterday, I sent the following inquiry to the Roosevelt Island Public Safety Department:
Can you provide more info on this incident - where did it take place, what time, did it involve a Roosevelt Island resident, did the person ask permission to jump from hill or was he/she just spotted before jumping and any other relevant information.Have not received a reply yet but will update if I do.
It looks like some Roosevelt Island residents may be missing the Tram Ride soaring over the East River and getting a little sick of the subway so they are taking matters into their own hands by trying to paraglide off of Roosevelt Island.
If you were walking around the Riverwalk Commons area in Southtown yesterday you may have seen this daredevil trying to capture a little bit of wind so that he could take off from Roosevelt Island and fly over the East River to who knows where.
After many attempts at getting the canopy up in the air and then running down the short hill, our intrepid Paraglider got a few feet off the ground but never made it off of Roosevelt Island.
Maybe next time when there is more wind he will succeed! Maybe not.
Here's how paragliding take-off is supposed to work.
Yeah, I'm sure that will work on Roosevelt Island - aren't you?
By ROOSEVELT ISLANDER at 12:34:00 PM 11 comments
Labels: daredevil , parachute , Paragliding , Public Safety
